ArticleCureus2025
Beyond the Curriculum: Exploring Perception of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Among Medical Students.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-12-05Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Methods · Objections by Author(s) ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) are essential elements in creating supportive learning environments within medical education. While global attention to EDI has increased, there remains limited empirical evidence from the Gulf region, particularly Saudi Arabia, where national reforms and institutional efforts are transforming the higher education landscape. Objective The objective of the study is to explore medical students' perceptions of EDI within a Saudi Arabian institution that emphasizes inclusive excellence and to assess the alignment of these perceptions with institutional strategic goals. Methods A validated EDI questionnaire was distributed in a cross-sectional survey to a total of 328 medical students. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate mean scores across inclusion-related items. Socioeconomic status (SES), nationality, and gender were used to examine group comparisons. Results Students reported high levels of inclusion in classroom settings (mean = 4.22), cultural representation (mean = 4.25), and access to mentorship (mean = 4.23). The items were three core domains: institutional support and inclusion, cultural sensitivity, and peer belonging. There were no statistically significant variations by SES, gender, or nationality. Findings reflect widespread satisfaction with institutional EDI practices and support the university's mission of fostering student-centered, technology-enabled learning. Conclusion The institution's strong performance across all EDI dimensions demonstrates a deeply embedded culture of inclusion and respect. Results affirm the effectiveness of strategic planning, digital integration, and stakeholder engagement in shaping equitable learning environments. This study contributes to the growing body of evidence supporting region-specific models of inclusive medical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.