Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41018438›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Emergency Laparoscopy for Complex and Trauma Cases: Feasibility and Outcomes in Experienced Surgical Teams.

Thalia Petropoulou, Aphrodite Fotiadou, Kyriacos Evangelou, Dominika Krasicka, Andreas Polydorou, Manousos Konstantoulakis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thalia PetropoulouSecond Department of General Surgery, Aretaieion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC.
Aphrodite FotiadouDepartment of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Ruprecht Karl University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, DEU.
Kyriacos EvangelouSecond Department of General Surgery, Aretaieion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC.
Dominika KrasickaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, GBR.
Andreas PolydorouSecond Department of General Surgery, Aretaieion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC.
Manousos KonstantoulakisSecond Department of General Surgery, Aretaieion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Laparoscopy offers significant benefits over open surgery, including faster recovery, reduced postoperative pain, and fewer complications. However, its feasibility in emergency settings, particularly for complex and trauma-related cases, remains underexplored. Key determinants include surgical expertise, theater readiness, and patient selection. Methods This observational, cross-sectional study was conducted over a two-year period in two high-volume university hospitals, one of which is a designated major trauma center. A total of 112 patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery by a single experienced surgeon were included. Data collected encompassed procedure type, conversion to open surgery, length of stay (LOS), complications, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and 30-day mortality. Comparative analyses between laparoscopic and open approaches were performed using the Fisher-Irwin exact test. Results Among the 112 emergency surgeries, 95 (84.5%) were completed laparoscopically and 17 (15.2%) via open approach. The cohort included category I trauma cases (n=6, 6.3%) and complex conditions such as visceral perforations and bowel obstructions. The median patient age was 75 years, and the median postoperative LOS was five days. Only one laparoscopic case (0.9%) required conversion to open surgery. Diagnostic laparoscopy was also utilized for undifferentiated abdominal pain. Major complications occurred in two (1.7%) patients and required reoperation. ICU admission was necessary in 10 (9%) cases, and the 30-day mortality rate was 1.7% (n=2). Conclusion Laparoscopy appears to be a feasible and safe option for emergency abdominal surgery, even in complex and trauma-related cases, when performed by experienced surgeons within adequately equipped settings. The low conversion and complication rates observed in this series reflect the critical role of surgical expertise, team coordination, and appropriate patient selection. While minimally invasive surgery is increasingly becoming standard in many emergency procedures, its successful application in high-risk or complex scenarios remains heavily dependent on operator proficiency. Broader adoption of this approach requires targeted training and further validation through larger prospective studies.

Indexed as

abdominal traumacomplex surgical emergenciesconversion rateemergency laparoscopyexperienced surgeon outcomesgeneral surgerylaparoscopic surgery in traumaminimally invasive surgery (mis)surgical outcomes

Identifiers

PMID41018438
PMCPMC12472756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.