ArticleCureus2025
Comparative Performance of the C-reactive Protein-to-Albumin Ratio (CAR) and the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Score in Predicting Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) Among Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI).
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inflammation-Based C-Reactive Protein-to-Albumin Ratio for No-Reflow Prediction in STEMI.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the STEMI-MIRI prediction model.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Association between C-reactive protein to albumin ratio and major adverse cardiac events in patients with stable coronary artery disease treated by percutaneous coronary intervention.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Relationship Between International Normalized Ratio to Albumin Ratio and Mortality in Critically Ill Patients With Myocardial Infarction.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a common emergency presentation. The C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) serves as a composite marker reflecting both systemic inflammation and nutritional status and may enhance prognostic accuracy in myocardial infarction (MI). Objective To assess the prognostic utility of the CAR in predicting disease severity and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methodology A cross-sectional, observational, prospective study was conducted on 203 patients with STEMI who presented to the outpatient and emergency departments between November 2023 and May 2025. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) scores were calculated, and serum C-reactive protein and albumin levels were measured within 24 hours of admission. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, while MACE, including reinfarction, revascularization, heart failure, and death, was assessed at 28 days through follow-up. Results Among the participants, the in-hospital mortality rate was 14 (6.9%), and the 28-day incidence of MACE was 38 (18.7%). Notably, MACE occurred more frequently in patients with elevated CAR, even among those with lower TIMI scores, suggesting that CAR may be a more sensitive early predictor of adverse outcomes. CAR demonstrated superior prognostic performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.726 compared with 0.668 for the TIMI score. Conclusions A CAR threshold greater than 0.568 was identified as clinically useful for early risk stratification in patients with STEMI. These findings support the integration of CAR into routine assessments to improve early prognostic evaluation and guide clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.