Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41018408›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Tolerability and Efficacy of Maribavir vs. Valganciclovir for Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Prophylaxis in High-Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients: Study Protocol.

Hannah Culpepper, Morgan Overstreet, Karim Soliman, Michael Casey, Teresa Rice, Kaylie Lively, Joseph Scalea, John McGillicuddy, Neha Patel, David Taber

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06034925 (Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Tolerability and Efficacy of Maribavir vs. Valganciclovir for CMV Prophylaxis in High-Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06034925 phase4completednot on this map

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Tolerability and Efficacy of Maribavir vs. Valganciclovir for CMV Prophylaxis in High-Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical University of South CarolinaRan2023 to 2025Enrolled70ConditionsTransplant Complication, CMVArmsMaribavir, Valganciclovir
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hannah CulpepperClinical Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA.
Morgan OverstreetClinical Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA.
Karim SolimanTransplant Nephrology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA.
Michael CaseyNephrology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA.
Teresa RiceTransplant, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA.
Kaylie LivelyClinical Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA.
Joseph ScaleaTransplant, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA.
John McGillicuddyTransplant, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA.
Neha PatelPharmacy, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA.
David TaberPharmacy, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a significant problem in kidney transplantation despite advances in screening, monitoring, therapeutics, and management. Although universal prophylaxis with antiviral therapy has significantly reduced the risk of early CMV infection and disease, late-onset CMV is still common and can be difficult to clinically manage in high-risk patients. A recent systematic review showed that with antiviral prophylaxis, early CMV infection occurred in only 6% of kidney recipients, and late infection occurred in more than one in six patients. The two antiviral prophylaxis medications this study is comparing, valganciclovir (VGC) and maribavir, are highly effective at preventing CMV infection. In studies using valganciclovir, the reported occurrence of leukopenia is 20%-40%, and neutropenia is 10%-30%. In studies using maribavir, the reported occurrence of neutropenia was 4%-5% versus 15%-18% in valganciclovir patients. With appropriate dosing, maribavir appears to have similar efficacy to valganciclovir in treating current and preventing future CMV infection with a significantly reduced rate of neutropenia. Methods Maribavir IIR is a 12-month, single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial enrolling 70 patients (35 in each arm) examining the difference in preventing CMV infection while specifically assessing the tolerability of the two antiviral prophylactic medications. The trial is currently in the follow-up phase, with the first patient enrolled in November 2023 and enrollment concluding in June 2024. Discussion The primary objective of this study is to assess the tolerability of maribavir versus valganciclovir (VGC) prophylaxis in adult kidney transplant recipients at high risk of CMV infection (D+/R- or thymo use if R+). This was done by assessing the incidence of leukopenia in the two arms, the occurrence of CMV infection despite prophylaxis, the impact of these medications on healthcare utilization and costs, and any outcome differences associated with race and sex. In this preliminary report, we describe the study design, methods, aims, and outcome measures that will be utilized in the ongoing Maribavir IIR clinical trial. Trial registration The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06034925: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06034925.

Indexed as

cytomegalovirus (cmv)drug randomizationimmunosuppresionkidney transplantation recipientsrandomized clinical trial

Identifiers

PMID41018408
PMCPMC12466315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.