ReviewCureus2025
Bibliometric Analysis of the 100 Most Cited Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis in Oral Pathology.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Significance of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
- Evaluation of Publication Growth in Pediatric Dentistry From 2005 to 2024: A Bibliometric Analysis.Cureus · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The bibliometric study aimed to analyze the 100 most cited systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) in the field of oral pathology. This is the first research on SRs and MAs conducted on citation analysis pertaining to oral pathology. On December 24, 2024, a search was made in the Web of Science database for 3,000 articles. Out of that pool, the 100 most cited oral pathology-associated articles were selected after confirming their indexing status in the PubMed database. Standard information on the periodic growth, authors, affiliated organizations, publication year, citation metrics, and research topic domains was recorded. Statistical analysis was conducted via the Pearson Chi-square test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The VOSviewer program was employed to conduct a network analysis for co-occurring key terms. The results depicted the 100 most cited articles from subjects of oral pathology/oral medicine and associated head and neck pathology published between 1990 and 2022. The journal with the highest number of articles was
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.