Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41018378›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Smartphone Addiction and Its Psychosocial Correlates Among University Students.

Mohammed A Alhassan, Emad M Al-Otaibi, Meshal S Bin Ofaysan, Khalid H Alarjani, Maan O Alzuhairi, Nawaf S Alarfaj, Faisal S Al-Murayt, Bader M Alotaibi, Khalid F Alanazi, Abdulelah M Alfawaz and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mohammed A AlhassanPediatric Medicine, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-kharj, SAU.
Emad M Al-OtaibiPublic Health, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-kharj, SAU.
Meshal S Bin OfaysanPublic Health, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-kharj, SAU.
Khalid H AlarjaniPublic Health, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-kharj, SAU.
Maan O AlzuhairiPublic Health, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-kharj, SAU.
Nawaf S AlarfajPublic Health, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-kharj, SAU.
Faisal S Al-MuraytPublic Health, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-kharj, SAU.
Bader M AlotaibiPublic Health, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-kharj, SAU.
Khalid F AlanaziPublic Health, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-kharj, SAU.
Abdulelah M AlfawazPublic Health, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-kharj, SAU.
Anas MusaCardiology, Rashid Hospital, Abu Dhabi, ARE.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAddiction to smartphones is an increasingly recognized behavioral issue among university students. It has potentially adverse effects on mental and psychosocial well-being.

objectivesTo assess the prevalence of smartphone addiction and examine its associations with six psychosocial and behavioral health measures among university students.

methodsA cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted among university students in Saudi Arabia. Using convenience sampling, we collected demographic data along with validated instruments: the 10-item Smartphone Addiction Scale-Short Version (SAS-SV) for addiction risk, and five additional validated scales for assessing depression, anxiety, sleep quality, physical activity, and social connectedness. Data were analyzed using Stata 17 (StatCorp LLC, College Station, TX) with descriptive statistics, between-group tests (t‑tests, Mann-Whitney U, χ²), Spearman correlations, and crude logistic regression analyses.

resultsA total of 383 students completed the survey, with a mean daily smartphone use of 7.6 ± 3.5 hrs. Overall, 268 (70.0%) individuals screened at risk for smartphone addiction, with no significant differences by gender, age, or academic grades. However, a higher risk was observed in computer engineering and business students (p = 0.043) and among those who used phones for longer periods daily (p < 0.001). Probable depression and anxiety were present in 176 (45.9%) and 162 (42.3%) participants, respectively, and were associated with increased odds of smartphone addiction (odds ratio (OR) = 3.83, 95 % CI 2.35-6.25; OR = 3.11, 95 % CI 1.91-5.06). Physical activity and better sleep quality were inversely associated with addiction risk (OR = 0.54, 95 % CI 0.34-0.86; OR = 0.78, 95 % CI 0.63-0.96), while loneliness (34.0% vs. 15.7%, p < 0.001) and negative perceptions of smartphone impact (OR = 3.50, p = 0.001) correlated with higher addiction risk. Smartphone‑addiction scores correlated positively with depression (r = 0.43) and anxiety (r = 0.35) and negatively with sleep quality (r = -0.13) and physical activity (r = -0.20) scores (all p < 0.05). Frequent engagement in creative activities (OR = 0.47, p = 0.018) was associated with reduced odds of smartphone addiction.

conclusionSmartphone addiction risk was exceptionally high and strongly linked to depression, anxiety, and loneliness, whereas better sleep, regular physical activity, and creative engagement were protective. These findings reiterate the need for integrated interventions targeting students, combining digital literacy education, mental‑health screening, and lifestyle promotion.

Indexed as

anxietydepressionexerciseinternet addiction disorderlonelinessmental healthsleep quality

Identifiers

PMID41018378
PMCPMC12475987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.