ArticleCureus2025
Epidemiology of Shoulder Dislocations in the United States From 1990 to 2019: A Temporal Study Using the Global Burden of Disease Database.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction The shoulder joint is a common site for joint dislocation, with many individuals suffering from recurrent dislocations following treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the epidemiology of shoulder dislocations in the United States from 1990 to 2019. Methods The Global Burden of Disease database was utilized to collect epidemiological data on shoulder dislocations in the United States (U.S.) from 1990 to 2019. These data included age-standardized rates of years lived with disability (YLDs), prevalence rates, and incidence rates per 100,000 people. Using the U.S. Census Bureau definitions, the data were stratified into four regions: the Northeast, Midwest, South, and West. Bartlett's test was used to assess whether the variance of the dataset was equal. Welch's ANOVA was performed to assess differences in YLDs, prevalence rates, and incidence rates between regions. Results From 1990 to 2019, there was an 8.69% decrease in mean YLDs, an 8.69% decrease in prevalence rates, and a 9.14% decrease in mean incidence rates of shoulder dislocations. Women experienced a 0.78% increase in mean YLDs, a 0.77% increase in mean prevalence rates, and a 0.27% increase in mean incidence rates of shoulder dislocation. Men experienced a 15.45% decrease in mean YLDs, a 15.45% decrease in mean prevalence rates, and a 15.82% decrease in mean incidence rate of shoulder dislocations. Regardless of region, men were more likely to experience a higher mean rate of YLDs (1.06 vs. 0.79, p<0.001), higher mean prevalence rates (17.16 vs. 12.70, p<0.001), and higher mean incidence rates (115.25 vs. 84.59, p<0.001) of shoulder dislocations. The West region experienced the highest mean rate of YLDs, the highest mean prevalence rates, and the highest mean incidence rates of shoulder dislocation. The Northeast region experienced the lowest mean rates of YLDs, mean prevalence rates, and mean incidence rates. Men experienced higher mean rates of YLDs, prevalence, and incidence of shoulder dislocations compared to women (p<0.001). Conclusion From 1990 to 2019, the U.S. witnessed a decline in mean YLDs, incidence, and prevalence rates for shoulder dislocations. This trend varied by gender, with men experiencing notable decreases across these metrics, while women saw slight increases. Overall, men consistently had higher rates of shoulder dislocations compared to women. Geographically, the Western region had the highest rates, whereas the Northeast had the lowest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.