ArticleActa Cardiologica Sinica2025
Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants for Thromboembolic Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Concomitant Mitral Stenosis: A Retrospective Observational Study.
Article in Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anticoagulant adherence and associated complications and readmissions in older valve surgery adults: insights from a retrospective cohort study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Editorial Comment: Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants for Thromboembolic Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Concomitant Mitral Stenosis: A Retrospective Observational Study.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases the risks of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism, especially in patients with mitral stenosis (MS). Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are effective in preventing AF-related stroke and systemic embolic events. However, patients with AF and concomitant moderate-to-severe MS have been excluded from previous pivotal studies. We aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of NOACs with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in this patient group. Methods: This retrospective observational study used data from the Chang Gung Research Database. We enrolled patients with AF and concomitant moderate-to-severe MS between January 2010 and December 2019. Propensity score matching was used to balance covariates between the NOAC and VKA groups. The risks of stroke, systemic embolism, and bleeding events were assessed following treatment. Results: After PSM, 115 patients with AF and concomitant moderate-to-severe MS were analyzed, of whom 32 were treated with NOACs and 83 with VKAs. There were no significant differences in the composite efficacy outcomes and bleeding risk between the NOAC and VKA groups. However, the all-cause mortality incidence rate was significantly lower in the NOAC group. Cox regression analysis showed that CHA Conclusions: NOACs were as effective as VKAs in preventing stroke and systemic embolic events, with comparable bleeding risks in AF patients with concomitant moderate-to-severe MS. CHA
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.