ArticleMethodsX2025
A multi-modal AI framework integrating Siamese networks and few-shot learning for early fetal health risk assessment.
Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhanced Fetal Plane Classification in Ultrasound Imaging via Prototypical Networks and Few-Shot Learning.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Artificial intelligence and the future of maternal and newborn health in low-income countries: advancing equity, early detection, and health system resilience.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate fetal health assessment is challenging due to scarcity of abnormal cases, class imbalance, and limited interpretability of AI models. This study proposes a multi-modal AI framework using Siamese Neural Network (SNN) with few-shot and multi-task learning to address these gaps. The SNN employs contrastive learning with hybrid loss functions to simultaneously detect abnormalities and localize anatomical regions, improving data efficiency by learning robust embeddings from limited abnormal samples. To mitigate potential domain shift from heterogeneous data sources, we implemented curriculum-based pair sampling and stratified cross-validation, ensuring reported performance is not inflated by source-specific features. Clinical data streams are integrated using ensemble models with SHAP-based interpretability, enabling transparent identification of key maternal and fetal risk factors. Additionally, a vision-language model distilled from a large teacher network into a compact student model generates radiologist-style diagnostic summaries. With INT8 post-training quantization, the system reduces model size to <10 MB, supporting edge deployment in resource-limited settings. The framework achieves 98.6 % classification accuracy while reducing manual screening time by 60-70 %, offering scalable and interpretable solution for prenatal anomaly detection. Key methods employed include:•Siamese Neural Network with contrastive + multi-task loss.•Ensemble models (Random Forest, XGBoost) with SHAP interpretability.•Vision-Language distillation for clinical reporting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.