ReviewMethodsX2025
Health risks assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in meat kebabs through meta-analysis and Monte Carlo simulation.
Review in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health Risk Assessment of Dietary Chemical Exposures: A Comprehensive Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Soil polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in energy chemical industrial plants of Northwest China: Sources and health risk implications from a field-based study.Journal of environmental qualityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are included in various everyday food products, prompting worries over their possible detrimental effects on human health. This study aimed to estimate the health risks associated with PAH contamination in meat kebabs using a comprehensive meta-analysis and probabilistic risk assessment framework. The researchers collected information on PAH levels in meat kebabs (cooked by barbecuing, grilling, broiling, or smoking) from 42 studies found in well-known databases like Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and Web of Science, covering the years from 2011 to October 2023. Furthermore, health risks were assessed through chronic daily intake (CDI), hazard quotient (HQ), and incremental lifetime cancer risk (LTCR), with uncertainty analyzed utilizing Monte Carlo simulation (MCS, 10,000 iterations). The investigation revealed that meat kebabs were made using barbecuing (7.4 %), broiling (11.2 %), smoking (25.7 %), and grilling (55.7 %) techniques. The highest average concentrations were observed for pyrene (Pyr: 359.32 µg/kg) and naphthalene (Nap: 263.20 µg/kg), while benzo[a]pyrene exhibited a lower mean concentration (BaP: 1.79 µg/kg). Risk assessment indicated that HQ values for some PAHs, particularly BaP (1.× 10²) and Nap (3.93), exceeded the threshold of 1, indicating possible non-carcinogenic effects at high intake levels. However, LTCR values for all PAHs remained below 1 × 10⁻⁶, indicating negligible lifetime cancer risk according to USEPA guidelines. According to the results, although meat kebabs may pose a non-carcinogenic concern at elevated intake levels, the lifetime cancer risk appears within acceptable limits. These findings highlight the importance of promoting safer cooking techniques and public awareness to mitigate exposure to PAHs through dietary sources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.