Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41018247›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2025

A workflow to discover partial differential equations from data: Application to the dynamics of tree biomass.

Emilie Peynaud, Paulin Melatagia, Serge Stinckwich, Jean-François Barczi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emilie PeynaudCIRAD, UMR AMAP, F-34398 Montpellier, France.
Paulin MelatagiaUniversité de Yaoundé I, Cameroon, IRD, UMMISCO, F-93143, Bondy, France.
Serge StinckwichUnited Nations University Institute in Macau, Macau SAR, China.
Jean-François BarcziCIRAD, UMR AMAP, F-34398 Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mixed data and theory driven methods are promising approaches that can be used to bring better understanding of complex dynamics in life sciences. For vegetation growth, integrated knowledge may be lacking to design theoretical models like partial differential equations (PDE). This lack can be complemented by using data. The method presented in this paper is a generic computational workflow called CEDI that aims at discovering PDE models from data. As an illustration, we tested the workflow on biomass dynamics of three different 3D trees of specific architectural types. ● The name CEDI represents the four steps composing the workflow: data Collection, Extrapolation, Differentiation and Identification. ● The originality of this workflow is twofold: first, it encompasses the whole modeling process from the definition of the variables to the design of a PDE, and second it has been designed to be generic in a sense that it can apply to any dynamics and it covers most existing data driven PDE discovering methods. ● The workflow offers a framework to better understand data driven PDE discovering methods and a tool for modeling any dynamics, provided that right data and knowledge and also good algorithm settings are available.

Indexed as

Data-driven modelling of plantsParameter estimationPhysics informed neural networkTheory-guided data model

Identifiers

PMID41018247
PMCPMC12464683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.