Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41018246›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2025

Design of an improved method for cardiac MRI lesion analysis using CMFT-GAN and spatio-temporal clustering process.

Panyam Aditya Sharma, R Arunkumar, M Purushotham Reddy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Panyam Aditya SharmaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Annamalai University, Annamalainagar, Tamil Nadu, India.
R ArunkumarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Annamalai University, Annamalainagar, Tamil Nadu, India.
M Purushotham ReddyDepartment of Information Technology, IARE, Dundigal, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early and precise diagnosis is difficult due to the limitations of cardiac MRI lesion analysis, which include low spatial resolution, undersampled datasets, and insufficient lesion diversity. Because of poor feature regularization, insufficient spatiotemporal dynamics modeling, and a lack of pathology-aware augmentation, current systems frequently generate high false positives. We present a thorough enhancement and clustering framework that reinterprets lesion analysis in cardiac MRI in order to get past these obstacles. Our method combines motion-aware lesion consistency, synthesizes various pathological variations, and integrates multi-domain anatomical knowledge. Additionally, it uses a curriculum-based, progressive learning approach for classification and segmentation and guarantees structural alignment in feature space. Performance is greatly improved by this integrated approach: PSNR rises from 25.6 to 31.4 dB, SSIM rises from 0.74 to 0.89, the boundary F1-score rises from 0.67 to 0.81, and the dice coefficient rises from 0.72 to 0.88. The overall classification accuracy of 93.2% establishes a new standard for the evaluation of cardiac MRI lesions.•Transferring anatomical knowledge from well-annotated domains to improve cardiac MRI across multiple modalities.•To increase lesion diversity and classification robustness, use pathology-aware clustering and data augmentation.•A curriculum-driven hierarchical learning pipeline that incorporates structural, temporal, and spatial consistency.

Indexed as

Cardiac MRIFeature transfer GANLesion segmentationPathology augmentationScenariosSpatio-temporal clustering

Identifiers

PMID41018246
PMCPMC12466250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.