ArticleIbrain2025
Study on the efficacy of compound porcine cerebroside and ganglioside injection in patients with ischemic stroke: A randomized, single-center, open-label, prospective study.
Article in Ibrain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Compound porcine perebroside and ganglioside injection (CPCGI) was used to treat stroke. The study was initiated because of the high incidence of low-does CPCGI use in our area. However, no research has confirmed the effectiveness of CPCGI below the standard dose. Therefore, the aim of this study was to provide a reference for the clinical selection of different dose treatments. We collected ischemic stroke patients and divided them into three groups (low-dose group: Group A = 4 mL, Group B = 6 mL, standard-dose group: Group C = 10 mL). The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores, and the Barthel Index (BI) scores were performed before treatment and 14 days and 90 days post CPCGI treatment. For 90 days, the primary outcomes were calculated including the degree of disability, neurological recovery, and activities of daily living. All data were compared between pretherapy and posttreatment and among groups. NIHSS, mRS and BI scores improved on 14 and 90 days in each group. Group B and C improved than Group A on 14 and 90 days. The difference between groups B and C was not statistically significant. On 90 days, there were differences in the degree of disability, the recovery of neurological function, and the ability of daily living among groups. No drug-related adverse reactions occurred in the groups. Although 4 or 6 mL CPCGI had some neuroprotective effects, the standard dose of 10 mL CPCGI had the best effect on reducing the degree of disability and improving abilities of daily living.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.