ReviewIbrain2025
Research status of fetal hydrocephalus from 2003 to 2022 based on bibliometric analysis.
Review in Ibrain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hydrocephalus is the most common and devastating condition affecting the fetus. The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive overview of the relevant literature through bibliometric analysis. The survey covers the articles related to congenital hydrocephalus published in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database from January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2022. In addition to repeated literature, reviews and articles are included. We visualized the annual publication number, citation frequency, country/region, institution, author, periodical, and keywords with a range of software such as VOSviewer (1.6.18), Microsoft Excel 2019 (Redmond) and online analysis platform (https://bibliometric.com/ document). The results showed that the United States made the most important contribution to the research on fetal hydrocephalus. China's contribution has grown and developed strongly in recent years. The key words were mainly divided into four categories: basic research, epidemiology, treatment, and diagnostics. The number of publications related to fetal hydrocephalus has increased significantly, and it has a good development prospect in prenatal diagnosis and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.