ArticleJournal of asthma and allergy2025
Efficacy and Safety of Omalizumab Combined with Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Allergic Asthma: A Prospective Cohort Study in a Chinese Population.
Article in Journal of asthma and allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Indications for Biological Treatment Combined with Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy: Who Is It Really Intended for?Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Recent advances in biomarkers for efficacy assessment in allergen-specific immunotherapy.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Moderate-to-severe allergic asthma caused by dust mite sensitization is challenging to treat. Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only disease-modifying option but is limited by delayed effects, allergic side reactions, and poor adherence. Omalizumab, an anti-IgE antibody, may improve AIT's safety and effectiveness. Objective: To assess whether combining omalizumab with AIT is more effective and safer than AIT alone in patients with dust mite-induced moderate-to-severe asthma. Methods: This prospective study involved 37 patients divided into two groups: AIT alone (n=18) and omalizumab + AIT (n=19). Over 48 weeks, asthma control (ACT, ACQ), lung function (FEV₁%, PEF%, FEV₁/FVC), and airway inflammation (FeNO) were measured. Secondary outcomes included IgE levels, eosinophil counts, quality of life (AQLQ), and safety. Results: Both groups improved, but the combination group showed significantly better asthma control, lung function, and quality of life at week 48. Only the combination group had significant reductions in FeNO and eosinophils, suggesting stronger anti-inflammatory effects. IgE levels followed expected trends with no major group differences. Fewer adverse reactions occurred in the combination group; severe systemic events were reported only in the AIT-alone group. Conclusion: Adding omalizumab to AIT significantly enhances asthma control, lung function, and inflammation reduction while improving treatment safety. This supports its role as an effective adjunct in managing moderate-to-severe dust mite-allergic asthma in Chinese patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.