ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
An analysis of disparities in imaging for suspected traumatic brain injury among patient visits to emergency departments (2010-2021).
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Traumatic brain injuries (TBI) are an increasing global public health concern. Current guidelines for neuroimaging lack sufficient evidence on specific recommendations for conducting diagnostic imaging during emergency department (ED) visits for TBI. Moreover, imaging underutilization and healthcare disparities persist despite evidence that early access to imaging can significantly impact the prediction of functional outcomes in patients presenting with suspected TBI. Therefore, investigating neuroimaging utilization nationwide for patient screening amongst those who present to the ED for TBI is crucial. Methods: This retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), an annual, nationally representative sample survey of visits to hospital EDs in the United States, conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to evaluate predictors of interest available in the database on the use of imaging for visits to the ED with a suspected TBI. A graph of the annual percentage of ED visits at which imaging was used was constructed. Results: Visits by the Black race group compared to the White race group, by those 0-17 years, 18-39 years, and 40-64 years compared to those 65+, by females compared to males, and visits using Medicaid/SCHIP/CHIP compared to visits using private insurance all had lower odds of receiving imaging. Further, visits in the West and Northeast, as compared to the South and those in rural areas as compared to urban areas, had lower odds of receiving imaging. Visits by individuals with more chronic conditions were found to have higher odds of receiving imaging. After bottoming in 2014, imaging use increased. Conclusion: Disparities in the use of imaging for ED patients with a suspected TBI persist. Ongoing public health education efforts are needed to ensure proper screening during ED visits with a suspected TBI and for care post-TBI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.