Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41018185›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2025

Efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in postoperative patients with cerebral aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yue Gao, Xiaoyuan Sun, Guozhong Wang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yue GaoDepartment of Hyperbaric Oxygen, Civil Aviation General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiaoyuan SunDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Civil Aviation General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Guozhong WangDepartment of Hyperbaric Oxygen, Civil Aviation General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Surgical management of intracranial aneurysms frequently results in postoperative neurological impairments and diminished quality of life. Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) has emerged as a potential adjunctive treatment to enhance neurological recovery and functional outcomes; however, its effectiveness remains debated. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of HBOT on clinical outcomes, neurological improvement, functional independence, and health-related quality of life in postoperative intracranial aneurysm patients. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HBOT combined with routine postoperative care versus routine care alone were identified through comprehensive database searches of PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP up to April 2025. Data were analyzed using fixed- or random-effects models based on heterogeneity. Risk ratios (RR) and standardized mean differences (SMD), with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI), were calculated as summary measures. Results: A total of 11 RCTs, encompassing 2,268 patients, were analyzed. HBOT significantly improved clinical treatment efficacy (RR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.11-1.28, Conclusion: Adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen therapy significantly enhances neurological recovery, functional outcomes, and overall quality of life in patients following intracranial aneurysm surgery. These results advocate for the clinical adoption of HBOT; nevertheless, additional high-quality, multicenter studies are necessary to confirm sustained long-term effects. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251086811.

Indexed as

hyperbaric oxygen therapyintracranial aneurysmmeta-analysisneurological functionpostoperative recovery

Identifiers

PMID41018185
PMCPMC12460083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.