Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41018159›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2025

Comparison of electro-oxidation coupled with UV irradiation (UV/EO)

Pannika Duangkaew, Songkeart Phattarapattamawong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pannika DuangkaewDepartment of Environmental Engineering, King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi Thailand songkeart.pha@kmutt.ac.th +662-470-9163.
Songkeart PhattarapattamawongDepartment of Environmental Engineering, King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi Thailand songkeart.pha@kmutt.ac.th +662-470-9163.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0711-8971

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, electro-oxidation combined with UV irradiation (UV/EO) was used for atenolol (ATL) removal, and the results were compared with those of electro-oxidation (EO), UV irradiation, UV/chlorine, and chlorination. In addition, effects of current density (CD), UV intensity, electric potential, electrolyte (NaCl) concentration, ATL concentration, pH, and free radicals were studied. The UV/EO process was the most effective for ATL removal, followed by UV/chlorine, EO, chlorination, and UV irradiation. The ATL degradation was described by a pseudo-first-order rate model, and the observed rate constant (

Identifiers

PMID41018159
PMCPMC12466935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.