Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41018124›Full record

ArticleDiscover public health2025

Inequality trends in general health among young people across the 2001, 2011, and 2021 UK censuses.

Katrin Metsis, Joanna Inchley, Andrew James Williams, Frank Sullivan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katrin MetsisSchool of Medicine, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, KY16 9TF UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0827-6557
Joanna InchleyMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Clarice Pears Building, 90 Byres Road, Glasgow, G12 8TB UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8322-8817
Andrew James WilliamsScottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy, School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH1 2QL UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2175-8836
Frank SullivanSchool of Medicine, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, KY16 9TF UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6623-4964

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Evidence on health inequalities among young people is patchy compared to that among adults and younger children. This study examined the association between self-rated general health and a family's socioeconomic position among 10-24 year olds. Methods: We utilised 2001, 2011 and 2021 census microdata from England and Wales, and 2001 and 2011 data from Scotland. Descriptive methods were used to determine differences in general health status by sociodemographic variables, and logistic regression analysis to calculate the odds of reporting poor health according to the National Statistics Socio-economic Classification (NS-SEC) of the household reference person (HRP). Logistic regression models controlled for the effects of age, gender, household-level deprivation of education and housing, and UK region. Results: Conclusions: We observed a similar social gradient of self-reported poor health across the 2001, 2011 and 2021 census datasets; as disadvantage increased, the share of young people with fair or poor health increased. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12982-025-00975-y.

Indexed as

AdolescentsNational statistics socio-economic classification (NS-SEC)Self-reported healthSocioeconomic statusUK censusesYoung people

Identifiers

PMID41018124
PMCPMC12460572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.