ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Exploring the prognostic value of EBV DNA in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy using AI-based modeling.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Virus infections and cancers: from mechanisms to therapeutics.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Habitat Analysis for Risk Prediction of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Comparative Study of Different MRI Sequences and Regional Combinations.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA is a well-established biomarker in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but its integration into artificial intelligence (AI)-based prognostic tools remains limited. This study aimed to develop and validate AI models incorporating EBV DNA load levels to predict progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced NPC treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Methods: A retrospective multicenter cohort of 503 patients was divided into training (n = 301) and validation (n = 202) sets. Four machine learning algorithms-Cox regression, LASSO, RSF, and GBM-were applied to predict 1- and 1.5-year PFS in patients with advanced NPC. Model performance was evaluated using the concordance index (C-index), time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC), decision curve analysis (DCA), and interpretability tools such as SHAP values and partial dependence plots (PDP). Results: The 1-, 3-, and 5-year PFS rates were 100.0%, 91.5%, and 88.6% in the EBV = 0 group; 99.4%, 91.2%, and 88.5% in the > 0 and < 1500 group; and 92.3%, 81.0%, and 75.7% in the ≥ 1500 group, respectively, with statistically significant differences among the three groups ( Conclusions: High EBV DNA levels were associated with poorer PFS in advanced NPC. Among the models evaluated, the RSF model demonstrated the best predictive performance and interpretability. EBV-informed AI modeling represents a promising approach for enhancing individualized risk prediction and clinical decision-making in NPC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.