ArticleCurrent research in microbial sciences2025
Sampling frequency matters: mapping of the healthy infants' gut microbiome during the first year of life.
Article in Current research in microbial sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Stool Dynamics and the Developing Gut Microbiome During Infancy.Journal of biological rhythms · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early life events significantly influence the developing gut microbiome, yet the response time and duration of microbiome changes to specific factors, such as vaccination or solid food introduction, remain unclear. Consequently, determining the optimal sampling frequency to monitor gut microbiome development is challenging. This study monitored gut microbiome plasticity using 16S rRNA gene sequencing almost daily in one infant (A) and weekly in 12 others (B-M) during their first year. Changes were linked to external factors and their duration analyzed. Three bacterial colonization groups emerged: "Early-life colonizers," "Re-appearing colonizers," and "Later-colonizers." Weekly sampling underestimated microbiome variability, as individual samples within the same week differed by over 1 Shannon index, and most of the weekly coefficients of variation of different alpha diversity indices in the first 23 weeks were higher than 10 %. Alpha diversity variability decreased with age, but beta diversity variability remained high. Key events like solid food introduction and probiotics caused gradual but significant bacterial composition changes, with effects varying among infants. Sparse weekly sampling hindered a detailed understanding of the impact of maternal microbiome, diet, probiotics, vaccinations, and unforeseen variables. Analysis of weekly variability in alpha and beta diversity suggests that such rare sampling may not be sufficient in terms of the outcomes of interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.