ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development
Social Norms and Medical Students' Engagement With Cadaveric Dissection: A Qualitative Study and Integrated Model of Cadaveric Engagement (IMCE Model).
Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cadaveric dissection is vital in medical education, offering essential hands-on experience in human anatomy. With cadavers regarded as the "first teacher," students confront the realities of death early in their training. All medical students are expected to participate actively in dissections. However, inconsistencies in attendance and engagement are common. In some cases, cadavers are abandoned midway through the course, possibly due to psychological, social, or structural barriers. Understanding medical students' attitudes and perceived social norms toward cadaveric dissection is crucial for improving educational experiences and outcomes. Objective: This study explored the attitude and subjective norm of medical students at Makerere University toward cadaveric dissection. Methods: Qualitative study design was employed, using seven Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with first- and second-year medical students. Participants were purposefully selected to ensure diversity in gender and academic experience. Data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically. Ethical approval was obtained, and measures to ensure participant anonymity and psychological support were implemented. Results: Students' attitudes toward cadaveric dissection varied from strong enthusiasm and appreciation of its educational value to anxiety, fear, and emotional discomfort. While some viewed dissection as essential for learning, others expressed moral, religious, and psychological concerns. State of cadavers, peer influence, faculty support, and cultural beliefs, significantly influenced students change of attitude resulting to active participation or disengagement with cadaveric dissections. Conclusion: Findings informed the development of the Integrated Model of Cadaveric Engagement, which highlights the complex interplay of psychological, social, and structural factors influencing dissection behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.