ArticleCanadian medical education journal2025
An assessment of family medicine residents' and early career physicians' perceptions of their training: a survey from a single Canadian university.
Article in Canadian medical education journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The CMEJ profile: a strong contribution to health professions education in Canada and around the world.Canadian medical education journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To determine if family medicine residents and recent graduates believe that the current residency program is sufficiently meeting their training needs for independent practice. Methods: In 2024, a brief online survey using Likert scale and open-text questions evaluated McGill University residents' and graduates' level of agreement that family medicine residency training allows them to develop the necessary clinical knowledge and skills across nine domains. Medians and interquartile ranges were calculated to understand agreement and consensus of responses. Latent content analysis was conducted on qualitative responses. Results: Across 10 sites, 31 of 158 senior residents responded and 59 of 452 residency graduates participated. With high levels of agreement and consensus, participants reported their learning needs were being met in most domains of care. However, graduate responses suggest that the program did not meet their learning needs for Indigenous health and procedural skills. Additionally, resident responses had low consensus around care of vulnerable and marginalized populations. Conclusions: Learner needs may not be met in three domains of care within the family medicine residency program, a finding that aligns with the recent call for curricular reform in Canada. These results could help focus curriculum reform priorities to areas of greatest need.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.