ArticleCanadian medical education journal2025
Gender disparity in delayed childbearing among medical trainees in Ontario.
Article in Canadian medical education journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The CMEJ profile: a strong contribution to health professions education in Canada and around the world.Canadian medical education journal · 2025Article
- Against research: a case for the scholarship of application in Medical Education.Canadian medical education journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Physicians report high rates of delayed childbearing and are at increased risk of infertility and pregnancy loss. There are limited studies on this topic in the Canadian context, particularly for trainees. Our objective was to explore Ontario medical trainees' experiences with and knowledge of delayed childbearing, infertility, and fertility treatments. Methods: We administered a cross-sectional survey to all residents and fellows in Ontario. Descriptive statistics, multiple regression, and thematic analysis of free text responses are used to present the findings. Results: 460 trainees responded to the survey. Over half (57%) intentionally delayed childbearing due to medical training, with long working hours being the most cited reason (82%). Cis women were 85% more likely to delay family initiation than cis men. Rates of early pregnancy loss (17%) were similar to that of the Canadian average for this age group, while rates of infertility (14%) were slightly higher. Knowledge gaps were identified, with trainees scoring 62% on knowledge questions around age-related fertility decline and fertility treatment. The majority (73%) felt their programs were supportive of family initiation during training, with top areas for change identified as increased flexibility with working hours, and increased protected time for required extracurricular activities. Conclusion: Trainee physicians in Ontario report high rates of delaying family initiation due to training, with greater impacts on cis women compared to cis men, and slightly higher rates of infertility. Addressing knowledge gaps is one way to empower trainees to make informed family planning decisions going forward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.