Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41017945›Full record

ArticleJournal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering

Validation of an innovative algorithm for detecting self-propulsion in manual wheelchair users.

Rose Gagnon, Krista L Best, Brandon Alexis Valencia Ariza, François Routhier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rose GagnonSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2004-4006
Krista L BestSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7205-7725
Brandon Alexis Valencia ArizaCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
François RouthierSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5458-6233

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Actimetry is increasingly used to measure physical activity (PA) for manual wheelchair (MWC) users. However, conversion of raw data into interpretable PA outcomes remains imprecise, and the differentiation between propulsion and non-propulsion is challenging. Using a previously developed algorithm, the objectives of this study were to: (1) measure the accuracy of total distance collected, and (2) validate the algorithm's accuracy in differentiating between self-propulsion and non-propulsion. Methods: Experimental study consisting of two data collection sessions. Actimetry data (Actigraph GT3X+) were collected indoors (controlled conditions) during 100 repetitions (n = 40 MWC propulsion, n = 60 pushing the MWC) over three distances (10, 50 and 100 m). Actimetry data were also collected outdoors (uncontrolled condition) during self-propulsion over 1000 m (10 repetitions). Descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) with confidence intervals and accuracy measures (percentage of true value) were conducted for each trial. Results: The algorithm measured total distance covered indoors with an excellent accuracy (98.9% to 99.8%). It differentiated between self-propulsion and non-propulsion with an accuracy between 96.2% and 99.2% under controlled condition, and between 91.3% and 100.0% under uncontrolled condition. Conclusions: The algorithm tested allowed precise measurement of total distance covered, as well as an excellent discrimination between self-propulsion and non-propulsion. Preprint: Gagnon R, Best KL and Routhier F. Validation of an innovative two-part algorithm for detecting self-propulsion in manual wheelchair users.

Indexed as

actigraphmotion analysis systemself-propulsionvalidationwheelchair

Identifiers

PMID41017945
PMCPMC12464429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.