ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Mechanical deformations of bone generate interstitial fluid flow at nanoscale velocities around osteocytes.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microgravity-Induced Osteocyte Dysfunction: An Osteocyte Mechanobiology Unit Framework.Current osteoporosis reports · 2026Review
- Article
- Fibrin, from blood to bone: a review.Bone reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteocytes play a critical role in bone mechanobiology, sensing and responding to mechanical loading through fluid flow within the lacunar-canalicular network (LCN). Experimental measurements of interstitial fluid flow in bone are difficult due to the embedded nature of osteocytes in the dense mineralized matrix. Therefore, accurate computer simulations of these processes are essential for understanding bone mechanobiology. Two computational approaches have mostly been used to characterize convective interstitial fluid flow in bone: poroelastic finite element (FE) models, which treat bone as a homogenized porous medium, and fluid-structure interaction (FSI) models, which incorporate explicit LCN microarchitecture. However, these approaches have predicted fluid velocities that differ by three to four orders of magnitude. Here, we investigate the reasons for this discrepancy and demonstrate how imposed pressure gradients influence the predicted fluid velocities. Using an FSI model of a single osteocyte embedded in the mineralized matrix, we show that when an imposed pore pressure gradient is smaller than that generated by bone matrix deformation under mechanical loading, the convective fluid velocities in the canaliculi reach ∼100 nm/s and scale with the applied strain. In contrast, applying higher pressure gradients decouples fluid flow from the solid bone matrix deformation, resulting in fluid velocities bigger than 100 μm/s that are insensitive to loading conditions. Future studies investigating the effect of load-induced convection flow on osteocyte mechanobiology should therefore apply small imposed pressure gradients to avoid overestimating interstitial flow and more realistically capture load-induced convective flow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.