ArticleFood chemistry: X2025
Quantification of acrylamide in infant formula
Article in Food chemistry: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing total uronic acid quantification using a stable isotope dilution approach: validation and application to plant- and algal-derived polysaccharides.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Simultaneous determination of vitamin A and E in infant formula using a modified QuEChERS approach coupled with ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-diode array detection.Food chemistry: X · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accurate quantification of acrylamide within complex infant formulas remain a significant challenge. This study validates a novel method for analyzing acrylamide in infant formula, which combines the quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, safe (QuEChERS) pretreatment approach with the isotope dilution HPLC-MS/MS technique. The optimized QuEChERS procedure effectively eliminates co-extracted matrix interferences and achieves high extraction efficiency. Notably, this approach simultaneously accomplishes a recovery rate of 103 % to 105 %, a relative standard deviation of less than 1.6 %, and a limit of quantification at 0.90 μg/kg. The high accuracy of this proposed method is further confirmed using commercially certified reference material (CRM,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.