ArticleIndian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
Effect of the Community-based SPARSH Program on Control of Selected NCDs: Mixed Methods Evaluation.
Article in Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In community settings, lack of availability of care, nonadherence to medication, high cost of treatment, and poor outcomes of treatment are the core problems in noncommunicable disease (NCD) management. Is there an effect of the community-based SPARSH program on treatment adherence, treatment expenditure, and control among selected NCDs? What are the reasons for low treatment adherence to treatment from patients' point of view? Methodology: It was a community-based explanatory type of mixed method evaluation design, where major quantitative (cross-sectional survey) design followed a minor qualitative (free list) component. A representative sample of 850 NCD patients were selected by two-stage cluster sampling. Structured interviews were done to collect information on history of tobacco and alcohol consumption, treatment adherence, measurement of obesity, blood sugar, and blood pressure levels among known NCD patients. A directed acyclic graph was developed, and path analysis was performed using STATA software. Free list was done with patients who were found to have low adherence to treatment. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee. Results: As revealed from path analysis, NCD patients enrolled in the SPARSH program had better treatment adherence, which ultimately led to control of hypertension and diabetes. Ninety percent of patients enrolled in SPARSH had high adherence to treatment, and 90% of them had control in their NCD status. Patients with low adherence to medication reported three major reasons for it: 1) Conclusion: The SPARSH program was found to be effective to control hypertension and diabetes among enrolled patients for its services by improving treatment adherence among them. The key strategy of the program based on home visits to patients, counseling, and doorstep delivery of prescribed medication through trained village health workers contributed to treatment adherence and control status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.