ArticleIndian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
Scientometric Mapping of Scientific Production on COVID-19 and the Practice of Exclusive Breastfeeding.
Article in Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To determine the characteristics of scientific production related to exclusive breastfeeding during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Materials and Methods: The Scopus database was used to extract metadata. Data on the number of papers and citations were extracted for countries, public and private institutions, journal metrics, most productive authors, and collaboration patterns. VOSviewer was used to visually represent the geographic distribution of global research. Results: A total of 1529 papers were obtained from the Scopus database, and 258 papers were excluded. Publications published in 2020 are mainly found in Q2. They also had higher national collaboration (38.90%) and citation rate per publication of 15.7. Among the universities that published scientific papers on the subject, the University of Milan had the highest number of scientific publications according to the top 10 institutions (n = 8), but University College London had a greater impact (n = 258). Similarly, for the review according to article production, the Journal of Human Lactation ranked first with a total of 19 publications. However, The Lancet, despite its position in the ninth place among the top ten countries, had higher citation potential and impact (13.1 and 179, respectively). Conclusions: According to the productivity index in the top ten categories of most productive authors, Marienelli stood out the most, unlike Mosca, who had a higher publication influence and citations per publication (219 and 43.8, respectively). Most of the publications on this subject were published in high-impact Q2 journals. Europe (Italy) has been the leading country in this field of research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.