ArticleIndian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
Implementing and Evaluating Risk Assessment as a New Learning Tool in Family Adoption Program: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Training and engaging undergraduates in Family Adoption Program (FAP) is challenging due to increased visits, a large batch of students, limited resources, and less community cooperation. Routinely students are involved in history taking and community diagnosis. Risk assessment has the potential to be a part of the learning tool in FAP as it has not been utilized. To explore the perceptions of students, faculty, and villagers on risk assessment tool application in FAP and understand its challenges and suggest solutions. Methodology: Various risk-scoring scales and screening tests were introduced to the second-year students. It was a program development and evaluation design using qualitative techniques. By purposive sampling, focus group discussions were conducted with students, in-depth interviews obtained from villagers, and written feedback from the faculty. Data were collected till information saturation and manual thematic analysis was performed. Results: This method showed improved student knowledge and clinical skills, enhanced communication, health education, early case identification, and management. The impact on villagers was increased awareness, improved trust in community response, and positive behavior change. Faculty perceived it as an effective utilization of visit timings with educational benefits and engaged students as it is a task- and outcome-based learning. Challenges included limited resources, community mobilization, language barriers, and insufficient training. Adequate student training and preparedness, provision of learning resources, improved patient referrals, and follow-up care were the major solutions suggested. Conclusion: Adopting risk assessment tool learning in the FAP curriculum facilitates better student learning and engagement, along with improved community response and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.