ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2025
Formal and informal antimicrobial trade and usage in farmed animals of the urban area of Lomé, Togo.
Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inappropriate antibiotic use in livestock is a key driver of antimicrobial resistance. Surveillance and prevention efforts in low-income countries are challenged by widespread informal sales and administration. We investigated the antibiotics trade network for farm animals and farmers' antibiotic purchasing and usage behaviors in an urban region with high human and animal population density and prevalence of antimicrobial resistance. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 116 farmers in Lomé, Togo, in areas where multidrug-resistant bacteria had been identified. Using multiple-factor analysis and hierarchical clustering, farmers were categorized based on their livestock production, antibiotic purchase and usage patterns, and alternative disease management strategies. Additionally, 44 antibiotic distributors were interviewed using snowball sampling, allowing us to reconstruct the distribution network and its key actors. Commercial poultry and dog farmers exhibited significantly higher antibiotic consumption per unit of livestock biomass than other farmers, seeking to secure their production. Smallholders used antibiotics less frequently, often replacing them with phytotherapy to minimize costs. Large-scale farmers sourced antibiotics from legal distributors, whereas smallholders combined legal and illegal sources. Market wholesalers and retailers, mostly women, were central to the illegal antibiotic trade, primarily supplied through cross-border smuggling. Our findings highlight the need for antimicrobial resistance prevention programs that consider farmers' specific antibiotic use behaviors and motivations. Addressing the illegal antibiotic trade requires a gender-sensitive approach, as women dominate informal distribution networks. Understanding these dynamics is crucial to designing effective interventions to curb antibiotic misuse and mitigate risks of antimicrobial resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.