ArticleIDCases2025
Spontaneous sub-amputation from atypical critical limb ischemia in a patient without classical risk factors.
Article in IDCases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spontaneous sub-amputation is a rare manifestation of critical limb ischemia (CLI), most often associated with advanced vascular disease and comorbidities. We present a case of spontaneous foot sub-amputation in an elderly patient without major lifestyle-related risk factors, managed in a resource-limited setting. Case Report: A 76-year-old male with no history of diabetes, hypertension, or smoking presented after his left foot detached spontaneously during sleep, following two months of leg pain and two days of worsening discoloration and fever. On examination, he was septic, with absent left femoral and popliteal pulses and advanced gangrene. Imaging was not performed due to systemic and facility constraints. Emergency above-knee amputation was performed. Intraoperatively, thrombus removal was achieved using a Foley catheter in place of a Fogarty catheter. Postoperatively, the patient stabilized and showed good wound healing. Further diagnostics, including histopathology and thrombophilia screening, were not feasible due to financial and systemic limitations. Discussion: This case highlights an atypical CLI presentation in a patient without conventional lifestyle-associated risk factors, but with overlooked contributors such as prediabetes. The absence of imaging and vascular tools required improvisation for timely limb removal. The use of a Foley catheter for thrombectomy demonstrates adaptable practice in low-resource environments. Although the underlying etiology could not be fully confirmed, acute-on-chronic arterial occlusion was the most plausible diagnosis. Conclusion: Early recognition, sound clinical judgment, and surgical adaptability are vital in underserved settings. This case demonstrates that even with limited diagnostics and resources, effective outcomes can still be achieved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.