ReviewMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids2025
Measles and rubella: From global health challenges to advancements in molecular diagnostics in the elimination era.
Review in Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scorpion Peptides in Antiviral Drug Discovery: An In-depth Review.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Measles outbreak associated with an infectious travel.Tropical diseases, travel medicine and vaccines · 2026Article
- Surveillance and analysis of adverse events following immunization (AEFI) with measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine in Zhejiang Province, China, 2020-2025.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- A nested PCR-based point-of-care multiplex test for detection of bacterial pathogens in cerebrospinal fluids.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Approaches for Measles Virus: Methods, Advances, and Ongoing Challenges.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Measles and rubella are highly contagious viral infections with significant public health implications, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Despite the availability of effective vaccines, these diseases continue to cause periodic outbreaks, contributing to substantial global morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. Immunization programs have drastically abridged disease incidence; however, gaps in vaccination coverage and surveillance systems deter complete elimination. The economic impact of outbreaks includes direct healthcare costs and indirect societal losses, emphasizing the need for robust disease control strategies. Accurate and timely diagnosis is pivotal to measles and rubella elimination efforts. Current diagnostic approaches range from conventional RT-PCR (including multiplex and real-time formats), ELISA, and plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT), to emerging methods such as isothermal amplification loop-mediated isothermal amplification, recombinase polymerase amplification), CRISPR-Cas systems, next-generation sequencing (NGS), microfluidics, and lateral flow assays. Despite their sensitivity, many of these methods require complex infrastructure and skilled personnel, limiting their utility in field settings. To bridge diagnostic gaps, there is an urgent need for rapid, affordable, and field-deployable nucleic acid-based diagnostics that are simple to use with minimal training. Innovations like CRISPR-Cas and microfluidic platforms hold promise for decentralized testing and real-time surveillance, potentially transforming global measles and rubella elimination programs for the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.