ArticleHospital pharmacy2026
A Single Health System Retrospective Qualitative Analysis of Inpatient Apixaban and Rivaroxaban Calibrated Anti-Xa Level Monitoring and Clinical Implications.
Article in Hospital pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comment on "intracranial hemorrhage after ischemic stroke in patients on direct oral anticoagulants: results from a prospective observational study".Neurological research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The ability to obtain a quantitative drug level for apixaban and rivaroxaban exists using drug-specific calibrated anti-Xa assays; however, no standard exists defining when to obtain direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) concentrations or how to adjust medication regimens based on the results. Objective: Describe the incidence of DOAC levels obtained, identify trends in prescribing DOAC levels in clinical practice, and qualitatively assess level appropriateness and actions taken based on level results. Methods: A qualitative, retrospective analysis was conducted using the electronic medical record to identify adult inpatients within a 10-hospital health system with a calibrated apixaban or rivaroxaban anti-Xa level result from April 1, 2020, to November 1, 2022. The primary endpoint was the incidence of DOAC levels drawn. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of DOAC concentrations that prompted a dose change, association between dose or agent change and concentrations outside the on-therapy range, and association between indication for obtaining DOAC levels and resultant concentrations. Results: One-hundred thirty-two calibrated anti-Xa levels were obtained in 101 inpatients during the study period, representing a level drawn in 0.48% of all apixaban and rivaroxaban orders. Eighty-three (63%) patients were on apixaban. Primary reasons to draw DOAC levels were extreme body weight (35%), treatment failure concerns (23%), bleeding concerns (18%), and drug interactions (14%). Only 42 (31.8%) of all levels were drawn appropriately as a peak. Seventeen (40.4%) of the peak levels were within the on-therapy range. Of the 25 levels outside the on-therapy range, 14 (56%) resulted in no change in therapy. For all levels drawn, 70 (53%) resulted in no change to therapy. Conclusions: DOAC concentrations are often drawn at inappropriate times and seldom influence a dose or agent change. Future research is needed to determine if DOAC concentrations may be clinically meaningful in a select subgroup of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.