Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41017779›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2026

Emotions in Nursing Care Prioritisation Decisions: A Critical Incident Debriefing Study of Missed Nursing Care.

Mirit Cohen, Yosur Massalha, Anat Drach-Zahavy, Einav Srulovici

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mirit CohenDepartment of Nursing, The University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4472-1474
Yosur MassalhaDepartment of Nursing, The University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Anat Drach-ZahavyDepartment of Nursing, The University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Einav SruloviciDepartment of Nursing, The University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1291-8284

Funding

Cheryl Spencer Institute of Nursing ResearchIsrael Science Foundation 1038/18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo examine the decision-making processes underlying missed nursing care.

designA qualitative study using Critical Incident Debriefing interviews.

methodsFifteen nurses from inpatient wards in a general hospital participated in semi-structured interviews following their morning shifts. Interviews focused on care prioritisation incidents leading to missed nursing care. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsAnalysis revealed a central theme of emotions as crucial determinants in care prioritisation decisions. Two subthemes emerged: emotions as drivers of care prioritisation decisions and emotions as responses to these decisions. Positive emotions motivated nurses to prioritise care for specific patients, while negative emotions sometimes led to care delays. Successful care completion generated professional satisfaction, while care omissions produced complex emotional responses, including guilt, frustration and helplessness.

conclusionThe dual emotional processes identified in this study-emotions functioning as both drivers and responses in care decisions-challenge purely structural explanations of missed nursing care. This perspective reframes nurses as emotionally engaged decision-makers who actively navigate care priorities rather than passively react to contextual constraints, offering a more comprehensive framework for understanding the complexity of clinical judgement in real-world settings. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: This study positions emotions as legitimate components of clinical decision-making rather than cognitive biases. For nursing practice, this necessitates integrating emotional awareness into professional development. For patient care, recognising emotional underpinnings may promote equitable care distribution through interventions that engage with the emotional realities of nursing work. IMPACT: This study addressed limited understanding of decision-making in missed nursing care, particularly emotions' role. Findings reveal how emotions influence nurses' prioritisation decisions and wellbeing, with implications for nurses, educators and administrators seeking interventions addressing structural and emotional dimensions. REPORTING

methodThis study adhered to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) guidelines (Appendix S1). PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.

Indexed as

Decision MakingEmotionsNursing CareNursing Staff, HospitalAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchcritical incident techniqueemotionsmissed nursing carenaturalistic decision‐makingnursing prioritisation

Identifiers

PMID41017779
PMCPMC13176675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.