Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41017648›Full record

ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences2025

Prospective associations between accelerometer-measured physical activity, sedentary behavior, and healthy longevity: the  Women's Health Accelerometry Collaboration.

Eric T Hyde, Gretchen E Bandoli, Jingjing Zou, Noe C Crespo, Humberto Parada, Kelly R Evenson, Annie Green Howard, Michael J LaMonte, Marcia L Stefanick, Lesley F Tinker and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Eric T HydeHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5896-0894
Gretchen E BandoliDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States.
Jingjing ZouHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States.
Noe C CrespoDivision of Health Promotion and Behavioral Science, School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, United States.
Humberto ParadaDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6562-8577
Kelly R EvensonDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States.
Annie Green HowardDepartment of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0837-8166
Michael J LaMonteDepartment of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo-SUNY, Buffalo, New York, United States.
Marcia L StefanickStanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0284-6996
Lesley F TinkerDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Cancer Prevention, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Bernhard HaringDepartment of Medicine III, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
JoAnn E MansonDivision of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
I-Min LeeDivision of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1083-6907
Andrea Z LaCroixHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States.

Funding

Objective Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Health in Women Aged 80 and OlderR01HL105065 · NHLBI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI LACROIX, ANDREA Z. · 2011 to 2014
$5.0M
Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, and Cancer Incidence in WomenR01CA227122 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI EVENSON, KELLY R. · 2019 to 2022
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA227122NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL105065NIH HHS 5R01CA227122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe influence of physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) on survival to late age with intact mobility is unclear. This study investigated associations between accelerometer-measured daily PA, SB, and survival to age 90 birthyear with and without intact mobility in the Women's Health Accelerometry Collaboration (WHAC).

methodsPostmenopausal US women aged 78-89 years without mobility disability were followed for an average of 6.1 years. At age 90 birthyear, participants were categorized as: (1) surviving with intact mobility, (2) surviving with mobility disability, or (3) deceased. Participants wore an accelerometer on the hip for up to 7 days at baseline from 2011 to 2015. Covariate-adjusted multinomial logistic regression models estimated odds ratios (ORs) of PA (light, moderate-to-vigorous [MVPA], total, steps) and SB (sitting time, mean sitting bout duration) with survival outcomes relative to dying.

resultsAmong 2656 women (mean baseline age 83.1 years), 62.8% survived with intact mobility, 22.3% with mobility disability, and 15.0% died. Compared to dying before age 90, the OR (95% confidence intervals [CI]) for every 1-SD increment in accelerometer variables and survival with intact mobility were 1.36 (1.20, 1.54) for light PA, 1.69 (1.47, 1.96) for MVPA, 1.51 (1.33, 1.71) for total PA, 1.75 (1.51, 2.03) for steps, 0.70 (0.61, 0.80) for sitting time, and 0.79 (0.70, 0.89) for sitting bouts. Similar, weaker trends were present for mobility disability.

conclusionsThese findings corroborate the potential role of increasing physical activity in preserving physical functioning as an important element of healthy longevity.

Indexed as

AccelerometryExerciseLongevitySedentary BehaviorAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansProspective StudiesUnited StatesWomen's HealthAgingLight intensitySittingStepsWomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID41017648
PMCPMC12596480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.