Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41017645›Full record

ReviewPain medicine (Malden, Mass.)2026

Topical analgesics for neuropathic pain: an evidence-informed guide for the practicing clinician.

Erin Lawson, Priyanka Singla, Jeremy Adler, Charles E Argoff, Jeffrey J Bettinger, Arun Bhaskar, Hance Clarke, Anthony Eidelman, Salman Hirani, W Michael Hooten and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Functional and molecular diversity of human C-fibers in pain modulation.Current opinion in supportive and palliative care · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Erin LawsonCoastal Pain and Spinal Diagnostics, Carlsbad, CA 92009, United States.ORCID 0009-0004-7189-6411
Priyanka SinglaAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, United States.
Jeremy AdlerPacific Pain Medicine Consultants, Encinitas, CA 92056, United States.
Charles E ArgoffComprehensive Pain Center, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY 12208, United States.
Jeffrey J BettingerPain Management, Saratoga Hospital Medical Group, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6813-1515
Arun BhaskarPain Management Centre, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W6 8RF, United Kingdom.
Hance ClarkeDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.
Anthony EidelmanNeuromedicine Pain Division, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14618, United States.
Salman HiraniComprehensive Pain Center, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, United States.
W Michael HootenAnesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5645-6355
Jordan TishlerMass General Brigham, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States.ORCID 0009-0008-7254-4089
Mark S WallaceDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, CA 92037, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5647-6233
Antje M BarreveldDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tufts School of Medicine, Pain Medicine, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, MA 02459, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1126-2797

Funding

Averitas Pharma, Inc.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain MedicineNIH HHSScilex Holding Company andAveritas PharmaUniversity of Toronto
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate available evidence for the efficacy and safety of topical analgesics for neuropathic pain and to offer treatment guidance.

methodsAn expert panel searched PubMed (Medline) and reference lists of published articles for available literature assessing 8 categories of topical analgesics used to treat various neuropathic pain conditions. The panel rated the level of analgesic efficacy evidence for each treatment and considered safety, ease of use, and cost. The degree of consensus on the recommendations among the panelists was measured.

resultsThere was strong evidence and high consensus that capsaicin 8% is effective for diabetic peripheral neuropathy and postherpetic neuralgia and that lidocaine is effective for postherpetic neuralgia. There was strong evidence and moderate consensus that capsaicin 8% could be effective for HIV-induced neuropathy. There was moderate evidence and high consensus that lidocaine is likely effective for diabetic peripheral neuropathy, idiopathic neuropathy, and postsurgical neuropathy and that capsaicin 8% might be effective for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy and complex regional pain syndrome. Evidence was weak for other topical medications, though the panel strongly agreed that antidepressants might help with postherpetic neuralgia, complex regional pain syndrome, postsurgical neuropathy, and post-traumatic neuropathy; that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs could help with postsurgical neuropathy; and that gabapentin might benefit vulvodynia. There was less agreement about whether antidepressants might benefit diabetic peripheral neuropathy, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, and vulvodynia and whether capsaicin 8% could be effective for postsurgical neuropathy.

conclusionsRecommendations were based on a survey and grading of existing literature and, when strong evidence was lacking, the collective clinical expertise of panelists.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsEvidence-Based MedicineNeuralgiaAdministration, TopicalCapsaicinHumansLidocaineAnalgesicsCapsaicinLidocainecapsaicindiabetic peripheral neuropathylidocaineneuropathic painpostherpetic neuralgiatopical analgesics

Identifiers

PMID41017645
PMCPMC13017925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.