ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025
Refractory Status Epilepticus and Therapeutic Uncertainties: a Comprehensive Review on Targeting Neuroinflammation and Rationale for Developing a Platform Trial.
Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematic Design and Evaluation of Nasal Drug Delivery for Central Nervous System Disease from Experimental to Clinical Application.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Editorial: Cannabidiol: perspectives on drug-resistant epilepsy management.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Refractory Status Epilepticus and Therapeutic Uncertainties: a Comprehensive Review on Targeting Neuroinflammation and Rationale for Developing a Platform Trial.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Refractory Status Epilepticus (RSE) is a neurological emergency associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. The molecular mechanisms contributing to neuroinflammation in RSE are increasingly being recognized. Despite its severity, high-quality and conclusive evidence is lacking for many RSE treatments, especially regarding the optimization of antiseizure medications and emerging immunotherapies. In this manuscript, the use of immunotherapy as a valuable treatment option in RSE is reviewed. The example of Toclizumab is used, its potential efficacy demonstrated by a case series from our center. Traditional clinical trial designs have proven inadequate in efficiently addressing these evidence gaps for this complex and heterogeneous condition. In examining the wider evidence for the use of anti-inflammatory agents, including early immunotherapy, the scope for adaptive platform trials is explored to be utilized to develop an evidence base in this area. Neuroinflammation plays a role in propagating seizures and associated neuronal injury in RSE; these pathways may be amenable to immunomodulation. In this review, the limitations of existing observational data and the need for efficient, quickly translatable clinical trials are highlighted to evaluate multiple interventions for RSE. Innovative trial designs, such as adaptive platform trials, help generate robust evidence for rapid uptake in RSE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.