ArticleVeterinary dermatology2026
Machine Learning Model for an App-Based Tool to Assist With the Diagnosis of Canine Atopic Dermatitis.
Article in Veterinary dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCanine atopic dermatitis (cAD) is a chronic condition requiring life-long management. Accurate diagnosis can be challenging, with no reliable diagnostic test.
objectivesThis study aimed to generate a simple diagnostic model for cAD. MATERIALS AND
methodsMachine learning by Random Forest was applied to metadata from a prospective dataset of clinical cases definitively diagnosed with cAD alone or another dermatosis. The dataset underwent a division of 67% for training and 33% for testing, with the model being trained via stratified K-fold cross-validation on the former portion, while performance assessment was conducted on the latter portion. Nine referral clinicians across four European countries contributed 645 cases.
resultsModelling confirmed the value of the four tested metadata on a dog's history and reduced the initial 15 lesion locations tested to three. Metadata for the final model were: predisposed breed (any from a list of 31), predominantly indoor life, dermatitis onset age between 6 months and 3 years, dermatitis chronic, recurrent or a permanent background. Lesion locations were axilla, inguinal and other. Diagnostic prediction was 95% sensitive and 84% specific. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This model is a relevant prototype for an app-based tool to support general practitioners in the diagnosis of cAD alongside existing tests. It has high sensitivity and specificity based on four questions and three lesion locations obtained from a standard history and clinical examination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.