ArticleJournal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association2026
Small Burns Need Attention Too: Evaluating the 15% Burn Resuscitation Threshold in Adults.
Article in Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The American Burn Life Support course recommends fluid resuscitation of patients with TBSA ≥20% to prevent burn shock. Our center resuscitates patients with burns greater than 15% TBSA. Herein, we characterize that population. Patients with burns 15% to 19.9% TBSA admitted from January 1, 2019 to March 31, 2023 who received protocolized fluid resuscitation were included. Demographics, hospital course, and fluids received were reviewed. Fluid resuscitation was categorized as "below range" (Parkland formula [PF] < 3 mL/kg/%TBSA), "within range" (PF = 3-5 mL/kg/%TBSA or "above range" (PF > 5 mL/kg/%TBSA). Similarly, urine output (UOP) was expressed as "below range" (<30 mL/h), "within range" (31-50 mL/h) or "above range" (>50 mL/h). The resuscitation groups were compared. P < .05 was considered significant. Thirty-three patients received resuscitation via Brooke (9.1%), PF (63.6%), or other formula (27.3%). Most were male (81.8%) with a median TBSA of 17%; median age was 57 years. Almost 20% of patients required vasopressors during resuscitation. Fifteen patients were within the predicated range of PF, 15 were under, and 3 were over. There was no difference between the groups with respect to demographics, burn injury variables, or complications. Notably, the average creatinine and lactate 24 h postadmission were 0.9 mg/dL and 2 mg/dL, respectively. Half of the study patients received greater than maintenance; all were in either the within burn resuscitation range or above range groups. This retrospective study suggests that patients with smaller burns may benefit from resuscitation as 50% received more than maintenance. Resuscitation of smaller burns requires more study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.