ArticleAsian spine journal2026
Incidence of C5 palsy in anterior cervical decompression & fusion, posterior cervical decompression & fusion and laminoplasty for degenerative cervical myelopathy: systematic review and meta-analysis of 21,231 cases.
Article in Asian spine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk factors for C5 nerve root palsy following posterior cervical spinal canal expansion and reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Anterior Cervical Osteotomy: A Narrative Review and Proposal of a Mechanism-Based Decision Framework (The ACO Triad).Global spine journal · 2026Review
- The Double Blow Phenomenon: Back-To-Back C5 Palsy in Compressive Cervical Myelopathy Surgery: A Case Series.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
C5 palsy (C5P) is a common, yet poorly understood complication of cervical decompressive surgery, causing substantial disability and impacting postoperative quality of life. Despite extensive research, the actual incidence and distribution of C5P across different cervical surgical approaches over the past decade remain unclear. A comprehensive literature search was conducted on October 15, 2024, across Google Scholar, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Studies reporting C5P incidence following surgery for degenerative cervical conditions, published until 2024, were included, excluding reviews, opinions, letters, and non-English manuscripts. Ninety-seven articles were included, encompassing 21,231 patients undergoing decompressive cervical surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy. The overall incidence of postoperative C5P was 7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4%-10%). The highest incidence was observed with circumferential fusion (combined anterior-posterior approach) at 16% (95% CI, 8%-24%), while the lowest was with anterior cervical decompression and fusion at 4% (95% CI, 3%-5%). Incidence rates following laminoplasty and laminectomy and fusion were 6% (95% CI, 5%-7%) and 10% (95% CI, 8%-12%), respectively. Recovery time ranged from 20.9 to 35 weeks, with 19.1%-33% of patients experiencing residual weakness. Significant risk factors included male sex, preoperative intervertebral foraminal stenosis, ossified posterior longitudinal ligament, open-door laminoplasty, laminectomy (with/without fusion), and excessive spinal cord shift. The role of C4-5 foraminotomy remains contested. Our meta-analysis identifies the posterior surgical approach as a significant risk factor for C5P. Circumferential fusion poses the highest risk, while laminoplasty can reduce the risk compared to laminectomy (alone or with instrumented fusion).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.