Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41017244›Full record

ArticleThe Biochemical journal2025

Membrane disruption attenuates agonist potency in prostanoid receptors.

Uurtuya Hochban, Imke Wallenstein, Michaela Ulrich, Alwina Bittner, Lisa Spänig, Katharina Klingelhöfer, Sebastian Neumann, Torsten Steinmetzer, Moritz Bünemann, Michael Kurz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Biochemical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Uurtuya HochbanDepartment of Pharmacy, Marburg University, Institute of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Marburg, Germany.
Imke WallensteinDepartment of Pharmacy, Marburg University, Institute of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Marburg, Germany.
Michaela UlrichDepartment of Pharmacy, Marburg University, Institute of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0007-1190-4215
Alwina BittnerDepartment of Pharmacy, Marburg University, Institute of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Marburg, Germany.
Lisa SpänigDepartment of Pharmacy, Marburg University, Institute of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Marburg, Germany.
Katharina KlingelhöferDepartment of Pharmacy, Marburg University, Institute of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4104-7844
Sebastian NeumannDepartment of Pharmacy, Marburg University, Institute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Marburg, Germany.
Torsten SteinmetzerDepartment of Pharmacy, Marburg University, Institute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Marburg, Germany.
Moritz BünemannDepartment of Pharmacy, Marburg University, Institute of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2259-4378
Michael KurzDepartment of Pharmacy, Marburg University, Institute of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0326-2404

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft BU 1133/5-1Hessen State Ministry of Higher Education, Research and the Arts GLUE
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are key signal transducers and the target of about one-third of all FDA-approved drugs. Many structural and pharmacological studies rely on disrupted membrane conditions, such as purified receptors in artificial systems or radioligand binding assays using membrane fragments, even though it had not been systematically studied whether membrane integrity affects GPCR function. To address this, we developed Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based GPCR conformation sensors to directly measure receptor activation in both intact and disrupted membranes. Our results show that while some GPCRs remain unaffected, prostanoid receptor conformation sensors exhibit a strong dependence on membrane integrity: their agonist and antagonist potencies decrease up to 30-fold upon membrane disruption, revealing a crucial role of the membrane integrity in ligand-receptor affinity. Validation with wildtype receptors in functional signaling assays confirmed that these effects reflect genuine receptor characteristics rather than unspecific signals from the sensor design. We ruled out several factors that could explain the loss of affinity but were unable to fully elucidate the mechanism behind this phenomenon. Nevertheless, this effect may introduce bias into structural and pharmacological studies. It is therefore essential to account for membrane integrity and to employ optimized experimental strategies to ensure robust and reliable data interpretation.

Indexed as

Cell MembraneReceptors, ProstaglandinAnimalsFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferHEK293 CellsHumansSignal TransductionReceptors, ProstaglandinFörster resonance energy transfer (FRET)G protein‐coupled receptor (GPCR)microscopymolecular cell biologyprostaglandinsaponin membrane disruption

Identifiers

PMID41017244
PMCPMC12687449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.