ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2025
Randomised clinical trial comparing intramuscular alfaxalone and butorphanol sedation with or without midazolam in hyperthyroid cats.
Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectivesThe sedation quality of intramuscular (IM) alfaxalone and butorphanol in combination with midazolam was investigated in hyperthyroid cats undergoing suitability assessment for radioiodine treatment.MethodsA total of 60 hyperthyroid cats undergoing diagnostic investigations were randomly allocated to receive butorphanol (0.3 mg/kg IM) and midazolam (0.2 mg/kg IM) with either alfaxalone (2 mg/kg IM) (BMA2) or alfaxalone (3 mg/kg IM) (BMA3), or butorphanol (0.3 mg/kg IM) with alfaxalone (3 mg/kg IM) (BA3). If required, additional alfaxalone (0.2 mg/kg) was administered intravenously. Cat Stress Score, response to injection, time to lateral recumbency, sedation score at 10, 15 and 20 mins and subsequent 10-min intervals, additional alfaxalone requirements, and time to first administration, recovery quality (excellent, fair, poor) and adverse effects were assessed. Thyroxine concentrations, gabapentin treatment and assessors were recorded. Heart and respiratory rate and arterial haemoglobin saturation were monitored every 5 mins. Data were compared using χ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.