Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41017021›Full record

ArticleThe plant genome2025

Harnessing genomic prediction in Brassica napus through a nested association mapping population.

Sampath Perumal, Erin E Higgins, Simarjeet Sra, Yogendra Khedikar, Jessica Moore, Raju Chaudary, Teketel Haile, Chu Shin Koh, Sally Vail, Stephen J Robinson and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The plant genome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Sampath PerumalGlobal Institute for Food Security, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3403-1625
Erin E HigginsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Simarjeet SraDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India.
Yogendra KhedikarAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9403-0926
Jessica MooreCargill, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Raju ChaudaryGlobal Institute for Food Security, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5370-6945
Teketel HaileDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6212-9489
Chu Shin KohGlobal Institute for Food Security, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Sally VailAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6103-8262
Stephen J RobinsonAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Kyla HornerAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Brad HopeAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Henry Klein-GebbinckAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Beaverloge, Alberta, Canada.
David T HerrmannCargill, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Katy NavabiNuseed America Inc, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5517-6490
Andrew G SharpeGlobal Institute for Food Security, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1832-4009
Isobel A P ParkinAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5807-9466

Funding

Cargill CanadaMitacs MITACS elevate fellowshipSaskatchewan Agricultural Development Fund 20110155
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic prediction (GP) significantly enhances genetic gain by improving selection efficiency and shortening crop breeding cycles. Using a nested association mapping population, a set of diverse scenarios were assessed to evaluate GP for important agronomic traits in Brassica napus, including plant height, days to flowering, 1000-kernel weight, and yield. GP accuracy was examined on each trait by employing eight different models, eight marker sets, varying population sizes and marker densities, and incorporating trait-associated markers identified through genome-wide association study analysis. Eight models, including linear and semi-parametric approaches, were tested. The choice of model minimally impacted GP accuracy across traits. Employing a training population of 1500 lines or more resulted in increased prediction accuracies. Inclusion of single nucleotide absence polymorphism markers with single-nucleotide polymorphism markers significantly improved prediction accuracy, with gains of up to 15%. The study provided estimates of GPs for major agronomic traits through varied prediction scenarios, shedding light on achievable genetic gains. These insights, coupled with marker application, can advance the breeding cycle acceleration in B. napus.

Indexed as

Brassica napusGenome, PlantGenomicsChromosome MappingGenetic MarkersGenome-Wide Association StudyModels, GeneticPhenotypePlant BreedingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LociGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID41017021
PMCPMC12477312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.