ArticleThe plant genome2025
Harnessing genomic prediction in Brassica napus through a nested association mapping population.
Article in The plant genome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating the host plant range of Contarinia nasturtii (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), reveals novel hosts and lack of host plant resistance within a Brassica napus diversity panel.Journal of insect science (Online) · 2026Article
- Harnessing genomic prediction in Brassica napus through a nested association mapping population.The plant genome · 2025Article
- Optimization and application of genome prediction model in rapeseed: flowering time, yield components, and oil content as examples.Horticulture research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic prediction (GP) significantly enhances genetic gain by improving selection efficiency and shortening crop breeding cycles. Using a nested association mapping population, a set of diverse scenarios were assessed to evaluate GP for important agronomic traits in Brassica napus, including plant height, days to flowering, 1000-kernel weight, and yield. GP accuracy was examined on each trait by employing eight different models, eight marker sets, varying population sizes and marker densities, and incorporating trait-associated markers identified through genome-wide association study analysis. Eight models, including linear and semi-parametric approaches, were tested. The choice of model minimally impacted GP accuracy across traits. Employing a training population of 1500 lines or more resulted in increased prediction accuracies. Inclusion of single nucleotide absence polymorphism markers with single-nucleotide polymorphism markers significantly improved prediction accuracy, with gains of up to 15%. The study provided estimates of GPs for major agronomic traits through varied prediction scenarios, shedding light on achievable genetic gains. These insights, coupled with marker application, can advance the breeding cycle acceleration in B. napus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.