Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41016999›Full record

ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2025

Detection of Anaphylaxis Through the Cutaneous Barrier.

Anjali Sundar, Marc S McMorris, Charles F Schuler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anjali SundarDivision of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Marc S McMorrisMary H. Weiser Food Allergy Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Charles F SchulerMary H. Weiser Food Allergy Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. schulerc@med.umich.edu.

Funding

University of Michigan MHWFAC CoFar CMC Center ApplicationU01AI181882 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI JAMES R. BAKER, Johann Eli Gudjonsson · 2024 to 2026
$1.1M
The role of epithelial barrier dysfunction in food anaphylaxisK23AI162661 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Charles F Schuler · 2022 to 2026
$972k
NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI162661NIAID NIH HHS L30 AI171988NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI181882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe capacity to rapidly and objectively detect impending anaphylaxis is a crucial unmet need in food allergy, as clinical impression remains the only means of anaphylaxis diagnosis. Changes in the cutaneous barrier during an allergic reaction might offer an objective, rapid, and accessible anaphylaxis detection method. RECENT

findingsChanges in cutaneous temperature and skin permeability might serve as markers of anaphylaxis. Existing methods around facial thermography, cutaneous blood flow measurements, electrical impedance spectroscopy, and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) offer varied data as possible food anaphylaxis biomarkers. Further data is needed to validate these and other methods as a means to non-invasively detect anaphylaxis. This review describes key advances in anaphylaxis detection through the cutaneous barrier, most notably around skin barrier function in the context of atopic dermatitis and food allergy.

Indexed as

AnaphylaxisDermatitis, AtopicFood HypersensitivitySkinDielectric SpectroscopyFaceHumansPermeabilitySkin TemperatureThermographyAnaphylaxis detectionAtopic dermatitisCutaneous barrierEpithelial barrierFood allergyOral food challengeSkin barrierTight junctionsTransepidermal water loss

Identifiers

PMID41016999
PMCPMC12477081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.