ArticleAIDS and behavior2026
Awareness, Acceptance, and Uptake of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis among Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) in Northwestern China: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We assessed the awareness, acceptance (willingness to use), and uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), along with the gap between PrEP eligibility and self-perceived HIV risk among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Shaanxi Province, China in 2022. Participants completed surveys on PrEP, and were screened for HIV, syphilis, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. PrEP eligibility was determined using Chinese PrEP guidelines, and participants' self-perceived HIV risk was documented. Multivariable logistic regression Analysed factors influencing PrEP-related outcomes And the discrepancy between perceived and actual risk. Among 1,085 participants (median age: 32 years), 54.4% resided in urban areas, 71.1% identified as homosexual, And 60.8% held a college degree or higher. Although 87.0% were PrEP-eligible, only 28.5% were identified as high risk. PrEP awareness was 82.0%, yet only 8.8% had used it, And 3.3% currently used it. Despite 72.9% expressing willingness, uptake was hindered by high costs. Rural residence and lower education correlated with reduced awareness and acceptance, while greater income, more male partners, and recent STI testing predicted higher acceptance. Prior PEP use was strongly associated with PrEP use. Targeted efforts to improve affordability, accessibility, and education are crucial for better prevention results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.