Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41016989›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2025

Investigation of the effects of endovenous thermocoagulation methods on perivenous and venous tissue in an ex-vivo animal model.

Elmas Kanbur Üreyen, Zeki Talas, Ezel Erşen, Kazım Beşirli, Ahmet Kürşat Bozkurt, Ozan Onur Balkanay

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elmas Kanbur ÜreyenBilecik Government Hospital, Cardiovascular Surgery Clinic, Bilecik, Turkey.
Zeki TalasKocaeli University School of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Ezel ErşenIstanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Istanbul, Turkey.
Kazım BeşirliSpecial Medical Center, Cardiovascular Surgery Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ahmet Kürşat BozkurtIstanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ozan Onur BalkanayIstanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Istanbul, Turkey. ozanonur.balkanay@iuc.edu.tr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of venous insufficiency involves a variety of techniques. In this study, we evaluated three endovenous ablation modalities: the 980 nm diode laser, the 1470 nm diode laser, and radiofrequency (RF) ablation. The 980 nm diode laser primarily targets hemoglobin, utilizing bare-tip fibers to deliver energy that induces vein closure through photothermal effects. The 1470 nm diode laser exhibits higher absorption by water, employing radial fibers to achieve uniform vein wall heating with reduced collateral damage. RF ablation operates by delivering controlled thermal energy via a catheter, causing collagen contraction and vein closure.​ This study aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy of different endovenous ablation methods for varicose vein disease, with a focus on identifying the treatment modality that results in the least tissue damage. Bovine hind leg veins were utilized for this experimental study. A total of fifteen vein samples were prepared for each of the following treatment modalities: radiofrequency ablation, 980 nm laser, and 1470 nm laser. Following the treatments, the excised veins and surrounding tissues were subjected to histopathological evaluation. Key parameters assessed included vein wall narrowing, surrounding tissue damage, and vein wall perforation for each treatment group. Radiofrequency ablation demonstrated the most favorable outcomes, with no observed tissue loss. The levels of necrosis, coagulation, perforation, vein wall necrosis, and intimal damage were significantly lower in the radiofrequency group compared to both laser ablation groups. Among the laser treatments, the 1470 nm laser exhibited better safety profiles compared to the 980 nm laser. Based on our findings, both radiofrequency ablation and 1470 nm laser treatment appear to be more reliable than the 980 nm laser in terms of minimizing vascular wall and surrounding tissue damage. Radiofrequency ablation, in particular, emerged as the safest modality, showing the least adverse effects on vascular structures.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresLaser CoagulationLasers, SemiconductorSaphenous VeinVaricose VeinsVenous InsufficiencyAnimalsCattleDisease Models, AnimalLaser TherapyRadiofrequency AblationChronic venous insufficiencyEndovenous laser treatmentEndovenous radiofrequency treatment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.