ArticleThe journal of behavioral health services & research2026
Mental Health Service Disparities in Persistent Poverty Counties versus Non-Persistent Poverty Counties.
Article in The journal of behavioral health services & research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Further Evaluation of Youth Mental and Behavioral Health in Rural Communities.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is a dose-response relationship between the incidence of psychiatric issues and poverty. To better understand disparities related to extreme poverty and inequality, this study aims to investigate whether there is a difference in mental health services between counties identified as persistent poverty counties and those not identified. Data from the National Survey on Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services and the U.S. Census American Community Survey were analyzed. A random-effects logit regression analysis was performed to determine the likelihood of access to various types of mental health facilities, behavioral health services, medical services, screening services, emergency services, and ancillary services. Adjusted regression results revealed that persistent poverty county status was associated with a lower likelihood of residential facility services (OR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.45, 0.96), a higher likelihood of medication use (OR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.20, 2.09), and a higher likelihood of ancillary services (OR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.05, 1.16), especially chronic disease management, housing, intensive case management, and peer support. Meanwhile, fewer trauma-related treatments were available in these counties. A subsample of rural counties showed similar results. Mental health providers in persistent poverty counties were less likely to offer residential and behavioral health services and more likely to provide medication and ancillary services. Implications for mental health policy and practitioners are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41016958What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.