ArticleLasers in medical science2025
Comparative analysis of 650 nm and 450 nm diode lasers in photobiomodulation for wound healing after tooth extraction in rabbits.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Plant Exosome Injection: A New Boost for Postlaser Vascular Repair.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT), which involves both stimulatory and inhibitory biological responses to light, represents a critical area of research requiring further in-depth exploration. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effects of 650 nm and 450 nm diode lasers on wound healing following tooth extraction in a rabbit model. Local anesthesia was used. A continuous-wave (CW) diode laser with wavelengths of 650 then 450 were used on wound after tooth extraction in 30 rabbits divided into three groups randomly and equally separated groups: control group (G1), 650 nm group (G2) and 450 nm group (G3), with laser parameters determined based on a prior pilot study in rabbits. The energy density for a 30-second exposure was 7.64 J/cm². The power output and the power density were 200 mW and 254 mW per cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
41016952What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.