Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41016861›Full record

ArticleJournal of intellectual disability research : JIDR2025

Personal, Social and Vocational Outcomes of Inclusive University for People With Intellectual Disability.

Mary-Ann O'Donovan, Nikki Wedgwood, Greta Westermann, Fiona Rillotta, Tess Aitken

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mary-Ann O'DonovanCentre for Disability Studies, The University of Sydney, Susan Wakil Health Building-D18, Level 7, Western Avenue, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3378-5305
Nikki WedgwoodSydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1928-7860
Greta WestermannCentre for Disability Studies, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Fiona RillottaDisability and Community Inclusion, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Tess AitkenMedicine and Health Team, Academic Services, The University of Sydney Library The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

Department of Social Services, Australian GovernmentNational Disability Research Partnership
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThough people with intellectual disability have historically been excluded from university education, over the past three decades programmes facilitating the inclusion of people with intellectual disability in higher education, including university, have been developed in some jurisdictions such as the United States, Canada, Ireland, Europe and Australia. There is limited examination of the full range of potential outcomes for students with intellectual disability participating in such programmes. Such research rarely explores barriers and facilitators in relation to particular programme models and the achievement of the potential outcomes. The current study set out to examine the range of outcomes associated with inclusive university programmes, with a particular focus on autonomy, self-confidence, inclusion and employment.

methodFor this scoping review, six academic databases were searched using broad search terms. Forty-five studies meeting our inclusion criteria were subjected to quality assessment to ensure only high-quality evidence informed data analysis. Twenty-two studies were included in the final review, from which data were extracted to answer our research question.

resultsStudents were reported to achieve outcomes related to employment, confidence, autonomy and social skills. Factors reported as either facilitating or impeding positive personal, vocational and/or socio-emotional outcomes for students with intellectual disability participating in inclusive university programmes included accessibility, expectations, supports, attitudes and acceptance, pedagogy and programme design.

conclusionsProgrammes that provide individualised support for the inclusion of people with intellectual disability in university life led to primarily positive outcomes for people with intellectual disability. We argue that a whole-of-university approach to supporting full and genuine inclusion of students with intellectual disability is needed and we provide recommendations for research and practice.

Indexed as

Education of Persons with Intellectual DisabilitiesIntellectual DisabilityMainstreaming, EducationPersons with Intellectual DisabilitiesStudentsEmploymentHumansPersonal AutonomySelf ConceptSocial SkillsUniversitiescollegehigher educationinclusive educationintellectual disabilityoutcomespostsecondary educationuniversity

Identifiers

PMID41016861
PMCPMC12580482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.